Legal Opinion

Patillo v. Patillo

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The action is for a judgment of separation. The defendant husband appeared in the action by Eustace V. Dench, Esq. The plaintiff wife moves by order to show cause to punish the defendant for contempt for failure to pay temporary alimony and counsel fees, as directed by the court on March 16, 1957, and for the entry of judgment for the arrears.

It appeared, from an exhibit submitted in support of the application for the instant order to show cause (which was granted on Dec. 30, 1957), that Mr. Dench had written the plaintiff’s attorney on November 22, 1957, shortly prior to the latter’s request…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Pitt v. . DavisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Hendry v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Karpf v. KarpfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. GinsbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Camp v. CampNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Daniello v. DanielloNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Puorto v. PuortoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API