Legal Opinion
Roth v. Roth
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.
The interesting question presented by this fourfold motion for a judgment for accrued arrears in alimony, and ancillary relief, is whether, on such a motion, the plaintiff wife is entitled to interest on the arrears from the time they accrued.
*702Notice of this motion was personally served on the defendant in Texas, and he has defaulted.
Although the motion is not opposed,.it is felt that the question is of .sufficient importance to warrant enunciation of the principles involved.
The motion seeks (1) leave to enter the judgment, in the sum of $12,159.56 (accrued at the rate of $15 per week),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Lake v. . LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Burstein v. BursteinNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of GlickmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Audrey D. v. Michael O.New York City Family Court · 1974
- Charles F. v. Therese F. F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972