Legal Opinion
Russo v. Sofia Bros.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for leave to serve and file an amended complaint.
Previously, Isadore Lorber, a defendant, moved for a dismissal of the complaint as to him for failure to state a claim. The motion was granted by Judge Coxe with a memorandum reading as follows:
“The complaint in this action does not allege facts sufficient to support a claim against the defendant Lorber. See Green v. Davies, 182 N.Y. 499 [75 N.E. 536, 3 Ann.Cas. 310] ; Lewis Invisible S. Mach. Co. v. Columbia Corp. [2 Cir.], 80 F.2d 862, 864.
“The motion of the defendant Lorber to dismiss as against him is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Lewis Invisible Stitch MacH. Co. v. Columbia Blindstitch MacH. Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. BradenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Rambur v. Diehl Lumber CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Ordnance Gauge Company v. Jacquard Knitting MacHine Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Roca Bacó v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- Anguiano v. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.