Legal Opinion

Lewis Invisible Stitch MacH. Co. v. Columbia Blindstitch MacH. Mfg. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1936No. 219PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff filed the usual bill in equity against the defendant for infringement of a patent. The defendant answered making certain denials, setting up some prior references and uses, and concluding with a defence and counterclaim. The defence is based upon the notion that the plaintiff has disqualified itself from suing in equity because of its unjust conduct in regard to the patent in suit; the counterclaim incorporated the defence in toto and asked for damages and an injunction. Thus the counterclaim is in effect only the defence in a new dress, and to it we may…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. United States v. Pan-American Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Howland v. CornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Glass v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Neff v. World Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API