Legal Opinion

Vermont Human Rights Commission and Stanley v. State of Vermont, Agency of Transportation

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 8, 2012No. 2011-081PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs Vermont Human Rights Commission (HRC) and Ursula Stanley, an employee of the State Agency of Transportation, appeal the Washington Civil Division’s decision to grant the State’s motion to dismiss her complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Ms. Stanley complains that, under the Vermont Parental and Family Leave Act (VPFLA), 21 V.S.A. § 472(c), which requires continuation of certain “employment benefits” during family leave, she was entitled to accrue, but was denied, paid vacation and sick time during the course of an unpaid parental leave. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Swett v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. MacDonough-Webster Lodge No. 26 v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. Parks' Admr. v. American Home Missionary SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  5. Marine Midland Bank v. BicknellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birchwood Land Company, Inc. v. Ormond Bushey & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. Columbia v. LawtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Human Rights Defense Center v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC and Correctional Care Solutions Group Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. JW, LLC v. Ayer and MartellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. In re Election PetitionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API