Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank v. Bicknell
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 19, 2004No. 03-127PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.
¶ 1. Marine Midland Bank appeals the trial court’s
dismissal of its action to domesticate and enforce a 1991 New York judgment against appellee, David Bicknell. We agree with the trial court that the action is barred by the statute of limitations, and therefore we affirm.
¶ 2. In 1991, appellant obtained a judgment against David R. Bick-nell and a co-defendant in the amount of $231,292.98 in the Supreme Court for the County of New York, New York. The judgment remains unsatisfied. According to appellant, at the time the judgment was entered, and up until sometime in June 2000, Mr. Bicknell…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ass'n of Haystack Property Owners, Inc. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. KochSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Wentworth v. Fletcher Allen Health CareSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Koerber v. Middlesex CollegeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Wursthaus, Inc. v. CerretaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- H&E Equipment Services, Inc. v. Cassani Electric, Inc. & Nicholas CassaniSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Vermont Human Rights Commission and Stanley v. State of Vermont, Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Angela Blake v. Damon PetrieSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Long v. ParryDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Sandy Bigglestone, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Financial Regulation, solely as Liquidator of Global Hawk Insurance Company Risk Retention Group v. Crowe LLPDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.