Legal Opinion

Barondon Corp. v. Nakawatase

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1961No. Civ. 25119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *

The Barondon Corporation, plaintiff and appellant, signed a contract with defendants and respondents wherein it undertook to assist respondents to develop certain commercial structures for leasing upon property owned by them and to prepare certain drawings, provide site work and “procure engineering” under certain terms and conditions. The contract further provided that appellants would “coordinate the exterior design of all elements of the project to insure unity of architectural design,” and provided also the amounts and times of payment of compensation for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McManusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Binford v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. West Covina Enterprises, Inc. v. ChalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Walter M. Ballard Corp. v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Lehmann v. DalisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ponderosa Center Partners v. McClellan/Cruz/Gaylord & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of ArchitectsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API