Lehmann v. Dalis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Defendant Dalis appeals from a judgment for $1,200 based upon findings that plaintiff is a duly licensed civil engineer and that defendant became in debted in the sum of $1,200 for work, labor and services as civil engineer in forming and drawing plans and sketches for the erection of a bowling alley building, performed and furnished by plaintiff at defendant’s request.
The sole defense, upon this appeal, is that these were architectural services and plaintiff, not a licensed architect or structural engineer, did not inform defendant in writing, prior to accepting this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Joseph v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Walter M. Ballard Corp. v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rosen v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Schmidt v. Kansas State Board of Technical ProfessionsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Johnson v. DelaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Ponderosa Center Partners v. McClellan/Cruz/Gaylord & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Barondon Corp. v. NakawataseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.