Legal Opinion

Lehmann v. Dalis

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1953No. Civ. 15485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Defendant Dalis appeals from a judgment for $1,200 based upon findings that plaintiff is a duly licensed civil engineer and that defendant became in debted in the sum of $1,200 for work, labor and services as civil engineer in forming and drawing plans and sketches for the erection of a bowling alley building, performed and furnished by plaintiff at defendant’s request.

The sole defense, upon this appeal, is that these were architectural services and plaintiff, not a licensed architect or structural engineer, did not inform defendant in writing, prior to accepting this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Walter M. Ballard Corp. v. DoughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Schmidt v. Kansas State Board of Technical ProfessionsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Johnson v. DelaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ponderosa Center Partners v. McClellan/Cruz/Gaylord & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Barondon Corp. v. NakawataseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API