Walter M. Ballard Corp. v. Dougherty
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff corporation brought this action for the balance claimed to be due for designing and architectural services rendered to defendant. The complaint alleges that plaintiff, a foreign corporation, is duly qualified to do business in California, and that all the architectural services were rendered by an agent of the corporation, Jones by name, who was a duly licensed architect. The defendant’s answer admits that the architectural services were rendered by Jones, and that Jones is a duly licensed architect, but avers that plaintiff is a corporation and is not licensed to practice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joseph v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Binford v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. Allied Architects Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Michael Francis and Queue, LLC v. Munir Rehman and HAK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Palmer v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lehmann v. DalisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Braxdale v. BangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.