Legal Opinion

Merkle v. Township of Bennington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1888PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Case .for injuries received on account of non-repair of bridge. Defendant brings error. The facts am stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

When this case was heard, the Court called attention of counsel to the repeal of the statute, contained in Act No. 264, Laws of 1887, under which the action in this-case was planted. The repeal is in express terms, and without any saving clause. Supplemental briefs have been furnished us upon this point. The repealing statute, however, substantially re-enacts the law repealed, with some slight modifications so as to include in the remedy afforded by its provisions damages for injuries received in consequence of the neglect of municipal corporations to keep sidewalks in repair, and to abolish…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Batterson v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Batterson v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Ry. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. M'Hardy v. WadsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Chambers v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Young v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Sayer v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Findlay v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API