Legal Opinion

Young v. Stephens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1862PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Kent Circuit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Christiancy J.:

Young, one of the defendants below, had been arrested under the act for the punishment of fraudulent debtors, and on the twelfth day of May, 1860, gave his bond to tbe plaintiffs below (judgment creditors) with the other-defendants' as his sureties, under the provisions of subdivision three of section ten of the act, conditioned that he would within thirty days from and after the said twelfth day of May, apply for an assignment of all his property, and for a discharge as provided in the one hundred and forty, third chapter of the Revised Statutes of 1846 (Comp. L. Ch. 168) and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hays v. LuskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  2. Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kinnie v. OwenMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Perkins v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  5. Scott v. HullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Snyder v. WilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Taff v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  5. State v. Citizens Trust & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API