Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1876PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo Circuit. This is trover, brought by Hill, as administrator of the estate of John A. Chambers deceased, against a son of the deceased, for the conversion of certain stock, grain and farming implements which the plaintiff claimed belonged to his intestate, and the son claimed as his own.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Ch. J:

When this case was brought to our attention before (Hill v. Chanibers, 30 Mich., 422), we endeavored to indicate rules which should govern on a new trial, and after a careful review of the present record, we are satisfied that in the main the circuit judge has kept within them. In a few instances it is possible that he may have been too liberal in admitting evidence that could have only a remote bearing on the controversy; but as we showed on the former occasion, the case is one in which the court should be very liberal in receiving evidence that can have any legitimate tendency…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wright v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Banaszkiewicz v. BaunMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Hohman v. HohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API