Legal Opinion

State v. Tallabas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 7, 1987No. 1 CA-CR 10506-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

The defendant asserted the insanity defense; to support it he offered testimony by a psychiatrist to whose examination the trial court had ordered that he submit for determination of his competence to stand trial and investigation of his mental condition at the time of the offense. The defendant had made certain damaging statements to the psychiatrist, which, had he not called the psychiatrist as a witness, the state could not have placed in evidence. The question on appeal is whether, by calling the psychiatrist as his witness on the issue of insanity, the defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Arizona v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. John Vincent FitzgeraldArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Marriage of Sinn v. SinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. State v. HegyiArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Hon. hegyi/rasmussenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API