Legal Opinion
Haskins Trading Co. v. S. Pfeifer & Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1930No. 13,410PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
By contract in writing the Haskins Trading Company, plaintiffs, agreed to sell to S. Pfeifer & Company, defendants, and to deliver to them in New Orleans a certain quantity of “Mexican' Black Eye Peas.”
The contract stipulated for the shipment of the merchandise “immediately from Mexican interior point” and for payment on arrival and inspection in New Orleans.
On the margin of the document, printed in rather bold type, appeared the following:
“All agreements are contingent upon strikes, delays of carriers arid other causes unavoidable and beyond our control. All prices subject to further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- H. T. Cottam & Co. v. MoisesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Bartley v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- General Commercial Co. v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Fish v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Owens v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Wolfe v. SampleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Claude Neon Federal Co. v. Four Hundred ClubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Dant & Russell, Inc. v. Grays Harbor Exportation Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1939