Legal Opinion
Fish v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 9, 1901No. 17PublishedCited by 5 opinions
‘ In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
This cause comes here upon appeal from a judgment of the circuit court, Southern district of New York, entered upon a verdict directed in favor of defendant in error, who was plaintiff below. The action was brought' to recover on a contract evidenced by bought and sold notes, which, mu-tatis mutandis, were identical. The following is a copy of the bought note:
Neiw York, October 29, 1898.
Messrs. George Hamilton: We have bought for your account from Messra William Fish, Jr., & Go.:
500 bales King AA 300 yard brown sheetings.
20 pcs. 40 yds.
3¾0. per yard.
[10 cent revenue…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Union Bleaching & Finishing Co. v. Barker Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Acme Mfg. Co. v. Arminius Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- Jackson Phosphate Co. v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Haskins Trading Co. v. S. Pfeifer & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- McFarland v. Savannah River Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918