Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Sample

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1932No. 14068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Plaintiff, a dentist, seeks to recover from a former patient tbe balance wbicb be claims is due under a contract in wbicb be undertook to furnish a complete set of false teetb, consisting of both upper and lower dentures.

He concedes that be did not complete tbe work in accordance with the contract, but asserts that completion was rendered impossible by tbe failure and refusal of defendant to return for further fittings, wbicb were necessary in completing one of the said dentures.

Defendant admits that she refused to return for further treatments and fittings, but asserts that she was justified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. H. T. Cottam & Co. v. MoisesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Bartley v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  3. Haskins Trading Co. v. S. Pfeifer & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Wilson v. BroomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aesco Steel, Inc. v. J.A. Jones Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
  2. LeBlanc v. City of PlaquemineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Brindell-Bruno, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Morvant v. Russell ClemmonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Giering v. LemoineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API