Legal Opinion

Angier v. Worrell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1943No. Appeal, 37PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

Plaintiffs brought this action in equity to set aside conveyances by William H. Worrell to his daughter, the defendant, as a fraud on creditors. The court below dismissed the bill and plaintiffs have appealed. As appellants have not assigned as error any of the findings of fact by the chancellor, a pure question of statutory construction is all that is here involved.

The father, through the intervention of a third party, on January 2, 1936, placed the title to all his real and personal property in himself and his daughter, the defendant, as joint tenants with right…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mardis, Administratrix v. SteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Peoples Savings & Dime Bank & Trust Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Splaine v. MorrisseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Leach's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. American Oil Co. v. FalconerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Buncher Company Financial Institutional Funding, Inc. Richard Santucci John T. Stabile v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Genfarm Limited Partnership Iv, in 99-3950 Buncher Company John T. Stabile, in 99-3925Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Moody v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. First National Bank v. HoffinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Sheridan v. LuceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API