Legal Opinion

Pierce Lathing Co. v. Isec, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1998No. 28895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Pierce Lathing Company (“Pierce”) and respondent ISEC, Inc. (“ISEC”) were subcontractors in connection with construction of luxury suites at the Caesar’s Palace resort in Las Vegas. The stated contract price was $78,000.00. The subcontract contained the following “retention” provision:

ISEC shall upon receipt from the Owner pay the subcontractor 90% of such work, labor, and materials and shall retain the remaining 10% until the final completion and acceptance of all work covered by this Subcontract, and such percentage so retained shall not be considered monies due and owing…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Marschall v. City of CarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Connecticut Printers, Inc. v. Gus Kroesen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. GNLV Corp. v. Service Control Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Whealon v. SterlingNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Campos v. Town of PahrumpDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
  4. Baluma, S.A. v. SriquiDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  5. Complot v. Rushmore Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API