In Re Appeal of Trahan Nov
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. This appeal is from a zoning enforcement action in which the Town of Fayston claims that landowners, Michael and Desiree Trahan, built a pond without a required permit and in violation of setback restrictions imposed in the Town zoning regulations. The Environmental Court granted summary judgment against landowners, holding that, although they had a permit for the pond by operation of law, their failure to appeal the Town zoning administrator’s decision of January 18, 2007 denying them a permit became final and unassailable under 24 V.S.A. § 4472. The court further concluded that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- City of Rutland v. KeifferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Wesco, Inc. v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re Snyder Group, Inc. PUD Final PlatSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Brisson Stone LLC, Allan Brisson and Michael Brisson v. Town of Monkton and Claudia OrlandiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- 14-16 Peru St Boundary Adjustment - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2021
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.