Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Trahan Nov

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 20, 2008No. 2007-359PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. This appeal is from a zoning enforcement action in which the Town of Fayston claims that landowners, Michael and Desiree Trahan, built a pond without a required permit and in violation of setback restrictions imposed in the Town zoning regulations. The Environmental Court granted summary judgment against landowners, holding that, although they had a permit for the pond by operation of law, their failure to appeal the Town zoning administrator’s decision of January 18, 2007 denying them a permit became final and unassailable under 24 V.S.A. § 4472. The court further concluded that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. City of Rutland v. KeifferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. Wesco, Inc. v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. In re Snyder Group, Inc. PUD Final PlatSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. Brisson Stone LLC, Allan Brisson and Michael Brisson v. Town of Monkton and Claudia OrlandiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. 14-16 Peru St Boundary Adjustment - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2021

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API