Legal Opinion

Wesco, Inc. v. City of Montpelier

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 3, 1999No. 98-454 & 98-455PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This consolidated appeal involves two properties, one owned by Timberlake Associates and the other by Wesco, Inc. (referred to jointly as “Wesco”), located on State Street in Montpelier. The Environmental Court granted summary judgment in favor of the City of Montpelier determining that conditional use permits were necessary for both properties. Wesco contends that the court erred in its determination because (1) the zoning board of adjustment was barred from requiring a conditional use permit when the zoning administrator’s determination had not been appealed within fifteen days as required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Fisher v. PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. In Re McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. Houston v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of Trahan NovSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Larkin v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API