Legal Opinion
Yamaner v. Orkin
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 5, 1987No. 11 (Adv.), September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
In this case we shall hold that an order directing a party to pay a fee to counsel for the adverse party, as a sanction pursuant to Maryland Rule 1-341, is not appealable under the collateral order doctrine. 1
Appellee and plaintiff below, Irene Ruth Orkin (Orkin), brought in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County an action to nullify the award of an arbitration panel rendered under the Health Claims Arbitration Act. 2 Defendants in the action were a hospital and the appellant, Yilmaz Yamaner, M.D. (Yamaner). The circuit court in May of 1985 set trial for Séptember 15, 1986.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Eavenson, Auchmuty & Greenwald v. HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. FinesilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Richard F. Kline, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Newman v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Legal Aid Bureau, Inc. v. FarmerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Maryland Board of Physicians v. GeierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.