Legal Opinion

Union Indemnity Co. v. Leidesdorf

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1930No. 110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The Universal Pile Fabric Coat House, Inc., sued on a policy of insurance issued against burglary. A receiver in bankruptcy was later appointed and substituted as plaintiff. A recovery was bad below. The insurance was effective November 6, 1924, and the burglary is alleged to have been committed on December 5, 1924, at the insured’s place of business in. New York City. It claimed the theft of $29,688.19 worth of beaver sets — fur collars and cuffs cut in shape to be sewed on ladies’ coats — and some crepe de chine silk. This merchandise is said to have been delivered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Romano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Reilly v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Redman v. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Redman v. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API