Legal Opinion

Romano v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 20, 1925No. 77PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

There are two counts to the indictment now said to charge the defendants below with the crime of violating the Tariff Act of 1922, § 593 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §§ 5841hl2, 5841hl3). The first count charges that between December 1, 1924, and January 1, 1925, “in the waters of Long Island Sound, off Huntington and within Huntington Harbor, Suffolk county, Long Island, state and Eastern district of New York, *' * did unlawfully, fraudulently and knowingly import and bring into- the United States * * 9 upwards of 8,000 cases of whisky and champagne, the same being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Nosowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. United States v. MeagherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas · 1888
  4. United States v. LazenbyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1925

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. The UnderwriterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  5. Arch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API