Legal Opinion
Redman v. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 30, 1934No. 268PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge. •
The errors assigned by the defendant challenge the denial of its motions to dismiss the complaint for insufficient proof and to direct a verdict for the defendant. Hence the question presented on this appeal is whether there was any evidence to support the verdict.
The plaintiff was a colored seaman, 38 years of age at the time of the occurrence complained of. On February 21, 1930, he was taken to a hospital with gangrene of the left foot, which ultimately necessitated the amputation of the lower one-third of his leg. The theory of his suit is that the gangrene resulted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Baltimore & O. R. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Falkenstern v. Town of GreenfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lonnie Brock, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati John Shirey, City Manager, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Railway Exp. Agency, Inc. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Scocozza v. Erie R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Fitzgerald v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Railway Exp. Agency, Inc. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948