Legal Opinion

Schuck v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 31, 1952No. 4-9666PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The litigation resulting in this appeal stems from a controversy regarding the balance claimed to be dne on a note attached to a conditional sale contract executed by Kenneth L. Schuck June 4th, 1949.

H. E. Garrett operates a motor sales business and delivered to Schuck a 1947 model Buick automobile, listed by the seller as a used unit. The contract shows the total time price to have been $2,328, of which $600 was paid. The note and contract were printed in a single form with perforations for easy detachment. As to the note, Schuck’s promise was to pay Garrett…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Harper v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Cheairs v. McDermott Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Wilson v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Garst v. General Contract Purchase CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Campbell v. Asbury Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Gralike v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Crisco v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. DeBow v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API