Schuck v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.
The litigation resulting in this appeal stems from a controversy regarding the balance claimed to be dne on a note attached to a conditional sale contract executed by Kenneth L. Schuck June 4th, 1949.
H. E. Garrett operates a motor sales business and delivered to Schuck a 1947 model Buick automobile, listed by the seller as a used unit. The contract shows the total time price to have been $2,328, of which $600 was paid. The note and contract were printed in a single form with perforations for easy detachment. As to the note, Schuck’s promise was to pay Garrett…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Harper v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Cheairs v. McDermott Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Wilson v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Garst v. General Contract Purchase CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Campbell v. Asbury Automotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Gralike v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Crisco v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- DeBow v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.