Legal Opinion

Garst v. General Contract Purchase Corporation

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1947No. 4-8163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein Smith, Chief Justice.

March 3, 1946, Garst signed Consolidated Motor & Aviation 'Company’s conditional sales contract covering a Studebaker automobile. The “bona ficle cash delivered price, including sales tax and extra equipment, ’ ’ was $843, w:ith a cash payment of $300. At the same time Garst signed a retail buyer’s order. It shows “cash delivered price in Little Rock, $843; cash on delivery, $300; net balance due, $543.” Supplementing these entries the following appears: “Special notes, $45.99; balance, 15 monthly notes of $45.99 -each; balance due, $543; rec. fee, etc., $146.85;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bank v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Harper v. FutrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Perry v. ShelbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Crisco v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Schuck v. Murdock Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API