Legal Opinion

Pottstown Iron Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1930No. H-229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Under section 1019 of the Revenue Act of 1924, 43 Stat. 253, 346 (26 USCA § 153 note) interest on credits against additional assessments was payable from the date of overpayment to the date of the assessment of the additional tax against which credit was applied. The plaintiff contends that this ease falls within the provisions of this section.

Section 1116 of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 9, 119, section 153 note, tit. 26, US CA, changed the situation with reference to the payment of interest upon credits, Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., v. United States (Ct.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlas Powder Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. West Leechburg Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kingan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. Revolution Cotton Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Leisenring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API