West Leechburg Steel Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
The question is whether, for the purpose of the interest provisions, the credit of the overpayment for 1918 against the deficiency for 1917 “was .taken” while the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 253) was in force or after the 1926 act (44 Stat. 9) became effective.
Section 1019 of the Revenue Act’ of 1924 (26 USCA § 153 note) provided that upon the allowance of a credit interest should be paid on the amount of such credit at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the date of the overpayment of the amount used as a credit to the due date of the amount against which the credit is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- The Floyd AcceptancesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. KaufmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Girard Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kingan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Pottstown Iron Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Revolution Cotton Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Boyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935