Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leisenring v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1933No. L-221Published

1DissentLittleton, Judge

Plaintiffs sue to recover $34,814.04, being the unrefunded balance of the overpayment of $77,338.94 for 1919 allowed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on his schedule of refunds signed May 15, 1924. The amount sued for was credited by the Commissioner against an additional assessment for 1917 at a time when the 1917 tax was barred by the statute of limitation. A certificate of overassessment was duly prepared by the Commissioner and delivered to the taxpayer showing his allowance of the overpayment of $77,338.94 for 1919' and the division thereof to the amount refunded and the amount…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. KaufmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API