Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2012No. 2011-0902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp, 134 Ohio St.3d 329,

2012-Ohio-5639.] BENNETT, APPELLANT, v. ADMR., OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp., 134 Ohio St.3d 329,

2012-Ohio-5639.] Workers’ Compensation—Scope of R.C. 4123.512 trial—De novo nature of trial pursuant to R.C. 4123.512 requires claimant to address all elements of a claimant’s right to participate in the workers’ compensation fund— Judgment affirmed. (No. 2011-0902—Submitted April 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hornschemeier v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API