Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp, 134 Ohio St.3d 329,
2012-Ohio-5639.] BENNETT, APPELLANT, v. ADMR., OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp., 134 Ohio St.3d 329,
2012-Ohio-5639.] Workers’ Compensation—Scope of R.C. 4123.512 trial—De novo nature of trial pursuant to R.C. 4123.512 requires claimant to address all elements of a claimant’s right to participate in the workers’ compensation fund— Judgment affirmed. (No. 2011-0902—Submitted April 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Oswald v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hornschemeier v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017