Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tooker v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1972No. Docket Nos. 30416, 30605PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

We have consolidated for hearing and determination two related proceedings pending before this court, to each of which San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) is a party. The first (1 Civ. 30416) is an appeal by one Tooker and others from an order of the San Francisco Superior Court denying their application for a preliminary injunction. The second proceeding (1 Civ. 30605) is an application by BART for a writ of mandate against W. F. Goelz, the treasurer of BART.

BART, as is well known, is a rapid transit district, the facilities of which are now under course…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sutter Basin Corp. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duffy v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Sacks v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Monette-Shaw v. San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Associated Students of North Peralta Community College v. Board of Trustees of Peralta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. California High-Speed Rail Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API