Legal Opinion

Blinder, Robinson & Co. v. Tom

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1986No. B009330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCLOSKY, J.

Appellant Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. (hereafter BR) appeals from that part of the judgment of the Los Angeles Superior Court which denied petitioner’s “Verified Petition for Depositions of Robert Davenport, Thomas J. Amy and Rodney K. Vincent” after the Commissioner of Corporations (commissioner) filed an accusation against BR.

Contentions

Appellant contends that (1) the commissioner abused his discretion by denying petitioner (appellant herein) the opportunity to obtain testimony relevant to the admissibility and weight of the only evidence alleged in support of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Gilbert v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Cimarusti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Sullivan v. Calistoga Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Knudsen v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API