Legal Opinion
Cimarusti v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 2000No. B136762PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.—
Introduction
Petitioners, Don T. Cimarusti, Larry A. Coon, Mark A. Saavedra, and John M. Saffold were youth correctional officers employed by the Department of the Youth Authority. Each petitioner received a notice of adverse action informing him that he was dismissed for engaging in or observing and failing to stop or report the use of unauthorized physical force on six wards in the custody of the Youth Authority and housed in the Nixon Cottage at the Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility. Petitioners appealed the adverse actions, and the matter is now pending…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- T.N.G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cooper v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kenneally v. MEDICAL BOARD OF CA.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blanks v. Seyfarth Shaw LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of PharmacyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- California Teachers Ass'n v. California Commission on Teacher CredentialingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Dutchess Bus. Servs. v. State, Bd. of Pharm.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Palmer v. St. George City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.