Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1997No. Nos. 63416-5; 63525-1; 63639-7PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

— Attorney Patricia Pethick moves to withdraw as defense counsel in these three criminal appeals because she can find no nonfrivolous issues to raise. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). For the reasons explained below, we grant the motions and dismiss the appeals.

The defendant in each of these cases pleaded guilty to a "most serious offense” after having been previously convicted of at least two other such crimes. Each defendant was therefore sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole under the Persistent Offender ("Three…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HairstonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. HairstonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. MorettiWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API