State v. Cruz
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Agid, A.C.J.
— Sabas Cruz appeals from his sentence of life without the possibility of parole under the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA), contending that the act was invalidly enacted and is unconstitutional because it violates the doctrine of separation of powers and the guarantee of a republican form of government. He also argues the act violates due process because it does not require the court to find his prior convictions beyond a reasonable doubt and violates equal protection because it includes attempted crimes as “most serious offenses.” He further asserts the act was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. MorinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.