Legal Opinion
Hurd v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1935No. Civ. 5436PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him in a suit under the provisions of section 231 of the Civil Code to determine the paternity of an illegitimate child. It was held that he is the father of the child.
The appellant contends that the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence; that the court erred in receiving in evidence a previous record of the proceedings of the juvenile court declaring him to be a ward of the court without first requiring the foundation for its admission to be proved. It is also asserted the court erred in denying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Nordin v. Eagle Rock State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Heine Piano Co. v. BloomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Nemo v. FarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Strauch v. BielohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Drummond v. DrummondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Poe v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.