Legal Opinion
Drummond v. Drummond
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1940No. Civ. 6380PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Cora M. Drummond has appealed from a judgment quieting title to real property in the respondents. It is contended the evidence fails to show delivery by the grantor or acceptance by the grantees of the deed of conveyance. A motion for new trial was denied.
December 29, 1933, the plaintiff, Silvester A. Drummond, then unmarried, executed and recorded his deed of conveyance to lots 7 and 9, block 55 of Artesian tract of Los Angeles, to the respondents, who are his son and daughter. February 16, 1934, in contemplation of marriage, Silvester A. Drummond executed his written agreement to convey to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Follmer v. RohrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Shaver v. CanfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Muzzy v. D. H. McEwen Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Belli v. BonaviaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Beaudry v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.