Nemo v. Farrington
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to quiet title. Defendants Lizzie Kincaid and Rosanna Farrington filed an an swer and cross-complaint putting in issue the title of plaintiff and setting up a chain of title culminating in said Eosanna Farrington and asking that her title be quieted as against any claim of plaintiff.
Both parties insist upon title by “adverse possession.” Plaintiff also claims by virtue of a judgment in ejectment rendered in favor of plaintiff’s grantor against the said Eosanna Farrington. The latter also claims the record title by mesne conveyances from the grantee of a tax deed.
1. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re Estate of DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wilson v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Mahoney v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Le Roy v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hurd v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Porter v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1908