Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 2005No. B177138PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, J.
On November 1, 2004, this court issued a writ of review to consider three related decisions of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) pertaining to the lawfulness of orders requiring petitioner, Southern California Edison Company (Edison), to enter into wholesale power contracts with certain generators commonly referred to and known as qualifying facilities (QF’s) at an administratively determined price. The decisions under consideration are D.03-12-062 (Dec. 22, 2003), D.04-01-050 (Jan. 22, 2004) and D.04-07-037 (Jul. 8, 2004). For convenience, all three decisions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- PG&E Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Independent Energy Producers Ass'n v. California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pacific Bell v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Utility Consumers' Action Network v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Utility Reform Network v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- (PS) Hawkins v. Kaiser PermanenteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Winding Creek Solar LLC v. California Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014