Legal Opinion
Utility Consumers' Action Network v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 2010No. D055666PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
In this proceeding, we consider the petition for writ of review filed by the Utility Consumers’ Action Network (UCAN) challenging Public Utilities Commission of the State of California (Commission) decisions Nos. 08-12-058 and 09-07-024, which granted San Diego Gas and Electric Company’s (SDG&E) application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to construct the Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Project (Sunrise). (Pub. Util. Code, §§ 1001, 1757; undesignated statutory references are to the Public Utilities Code.) UCAN does not dispute the sufficiency of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Southern California Edison Co. v. PeeveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Utility Reform Network v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Alvarez v. W & L Harris Ranches CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.