Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Yamhill County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Yamhill: Harry H. Belt, Judge. In Banc. This is an action by B. W. Nicholas against Yamhill County, Oregon, and W. Gr. Henderson, Sheriff. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Respondents move to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled cause upon the following grounds:

First: That the original pleadings have not been sent up, as required by Chap. 335, Laws of 1913.

Second: The appellant has not filed a transcript of the evidence heard in the trial court.

Third: The appellant has not served the printed abstract upon the attorneys for respondent, as required by Rule 6 of this court.

Fourth: That the printed abstract of record is not sufficient because it does not include a copy of the *618pleadings, and is not sufficient to give the court a full understanding of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Algona Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. RiderOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kinney v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dant & Russell, Inc. v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Swalko v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API