Legal Opinion

State v. Drake

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.

This case comes here practically on exceptions to the action of the court in the matters above noted. We are of the opinion that, even omitting the testimony offered after the case was reopened, there was sufficient evidence to go the jury to satisfy them that the defendant and prosecutrix were not husband and wife. The defendant answered to the name of W. C. Drake. The prosecutrix testified that her name was Charmain Knight; that she was of the age of fourteen years and that her family and defendant had lived near Powers for several years. It was also in evidence that the defendant was a man…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Nicholas v. Yamhill CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. City of Norwich v. StorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  4. Gager v. HenryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1878
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API