Legal Opinion

Abraham v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1926No. 16257PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was instituted in the superior court of Creek county on June 6, 1924, by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, for the recovery on a promissory note in the sum of $2,889.70, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per an-num from April 2, 1924, together with attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

A copy of the note was attached to the petition dated November 2, 1923, made payable to the First State Bank of Bristow, Okla., in the amount above stated, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fanson v. LinsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Fort Worth Lead & Zinc Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Carver v. James Shelly & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Harris v. Warren-Smith Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Gooldy v. J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. In Re Farmers State Bank of GarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API