Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Ada v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 22, 1929No. 17706PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
Defendant in error was plaintiff, and plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court. They will be so referred to herein.
This is an action for the conversion of notes, of $2,000 each, or the proceeds thereof. Plaintiff commenced this action on the 23rd day of July, 1924. After appropriate allegations as to her appointment and qualification as the executrix of the last will of J. F. Jackson, deceased, she alleged, in substance : That shortly prior to the month of September, 1923, J. F. Jackson was the owner of a series of five promissory notes, payable to his order, dated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hanover National Bank of New York v. SuddathSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hazlett v. WilkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Nashua Savings Bank v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barry v. Hubbard, Adm'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- National Bank of Kentucky v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Gooldy v. J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Benson, Admx. v. RosineOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
- Board of Education of Town of Ringling v. State Ex Rel. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.