Legal Opinion
Briney v. Santa Ana High School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 1933No. Docket No. 1441PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Respondent filed her petition seeking an order “directing said respondents by a peremptory writ of mandate to recognize said petitioner as a permanent teacher in said school district from the commencement of the school term in September, 1932, and that she be paid the salary to which she is entitled from said date, and be allowed to teach in said high school district as a permanent teacher in said high school district”. After a trial in which the material facts at issue were stipulated, a judgment was entered directing the issuance of the peremptory writ of mandate, as prayed for. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Khalil Semaan v. L. Quincy Mumford, Librarian of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Shoban v. Board of Trustees of Desert Center Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Sherman v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.