Ruddy v. I.D. Griffith & Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
In this workmen’s compensation case, we are required to determine the meaning of “earning power”, as that term is used in 19 Del.C. § 2325,1 and, in the ascertainment thereof, the consequence of an employee’s post-injury return to the same employment for the same compensation.
I
These pertinent facts are uncontrovert-ed: The employee, Bernard J. Ruddy, was a welder in sheet metal work in the employ of I. D. Griffith & Co. (hereinafter “Griffith”). On June 11, 1965, Ruddy fainted while at work at the plant. The attack came upon him as he worked from a ladder, in extraordinary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Glass v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Shaffer v. Midland Empire Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1953
- Bowen v. Chiquola Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pusey v. ReedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
- Mosley v. Bank of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Burton Transportation Center, Inc. v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Globe Union, Inc. v. BakerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Sjoberg's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.