Legal Opinion

Ruddy v. I.D. Griffith & Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 8, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

In this workmen’s compensation case, we are required to determine the meaning of “earning power”, as that term is used in 19 Del.C. § 2325,1 and, in the ascertainment thereof, the consequence of an employee’s post-injury return to the same employment for the same compensation.

I

These pertinent facts are uncontrovert-ed: The employee, Bernard J. Ruddy, was a welder in sheet metal work in the employ of I. D. Griffith & Co. (hereinafter “Griffith”). On June 11, 1965, Ruddy fainted while at work at the plant. The attack came upon him as he worked from a ladder, in extraordinary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glass v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Ham v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Shaffer v. Midland Empire Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bowen v. Chiquola Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pusey v. ReedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  2. Mosley v. Bank of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Burton Transportation Center, Inc. v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Globe Union, Inc. v. BakerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Sjoberg's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API