Legal Opinion

Sjoberg's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

We granted further appellate review to consider whether an injured employee whose average post-injury earnings ultimately exceed his average pre-injury weekly wage solely because of his working substantial overtime hours, is precluded from receiving partial compensation under G. L. c. 152, § 35. The Appeals Court held that the Industrial Accident Board (board) and the Superior Court correctly concluded that the employee was not so precluded. Sjoberg’s Case, 18 Mass. App. Ct. 1 (1984). We agree that there is no error in the board’s determination and we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Whyte v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Chapman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Haley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Frennier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Harris v. North American ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Dunne v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  4. Derosier v. WNA, Inc./Imperial Fire Hose Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Thomas's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API