Legal Opinion

Mosley v. Bank of Delaware

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 9, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this workmen’s compensation ease, the only issue is whether travel expenses, neces sary for obtaining vocational rehabilitation services tendered under 19 Del.C. § 2353, 1 may be recovered by the claimant. On the authority of M & M, Inc. v. Wade, Del.Super., 297 A.2d 403 (1972), the Industrial Accident Board found that such expenses were not recoverable; the Superior Court affirmed. We have reached a contrary conclusion and must reverse.

The claimant was totally disabled as a result of an industrial accident. Subsequently, at her employer’s request, she undertook…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ruddy v. I.D. Griffith & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Zallea Brothers v. CooperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. Bender v. Deflon Anderson CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. McCormick Transportation Co. v. BaroneSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. General Motors Corp. v. SocorsoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Carper v. New Castle County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. New Castle County v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Murphy v. Board of Pension TrusteesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API