Mosley v. Bank of Delaware
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
In this workmen’s compensation ease, the only issue is whether travel expenses, neces sary for obtaining vocational rehabilitation services tendered under 19 Del.C. § 2353, 1 may be recovered by the claimant. On the authority of M & M, Inc. v. Wade, Del.Super., 297 A.2d 403 (1972), the Industrial Accident Board found that such expenses were not recoverable; the Superior Court affirmed. We have reached a contrary conclusion and must reverse.
The claimant was totally disabled as a result of an industrial accident. Subsequently, at her employer’s request, she undertook…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruddy v. I.D. Griffith & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Zallea Brothers v. CooperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
- Bender v. Deflon Anderson CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- McCormick Transportation Co. v. BaroneSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- General Motors Corp. v. SocorsoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Carper v. New Castle County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- New Castle County v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Chrysler Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Murphy v. Board of Pension TrusteesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.