Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Quesada v. Orr

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1971No. Civ. 27835PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

This appeal relates to the provisions of Vehicle Code sections 13353 and 13354. Section 13353, subdivision (a), as relevant here, provides that one lawfully arrested on probable cause to believe that he was driving a motor vehicle upon a highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor shall submit to a chemical test for the purpose of determining' the alcoholic content of his blood. It further states that “The person arrested shall have the choice of whether the test shall be of his blood, breath or urine, . . .” If the person refuses to submit to such a test the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Ingram v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cahall v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Skinner v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Goodman v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Espinoza v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. MacKey v. Director of the Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API