Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Valente

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1958No. 37575PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was initiated by defendant in error to recover the amount of ad valorem taxes paid to- the plaintiff in error under protest. The statutory authority relied upon by defendant in eri’or is 68 O.S.1951 § 15.50, which provides that “ * * * where the illegality of the tax is alleged to arise by reason of some action from which the laws provide no appeal, * * *” the taxpayer may pay the tax under protest and bring suit to recover the taxes illegally collected.

The facts of this action are not in dispute. The valuation of deceased’s property was increased by the assessor for the year…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Hays v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Keaton v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. In Re TindellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Lairmore v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. KeyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Muskogee Fair Haven Manor Phase I, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Deep Fork Construction Co. v. Board of Tax Roll CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. MUSKOGEE FAIR HAVEN MANOR v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Opinion, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API